Home / News / Nicky Henderson receives £2,500 fine for horses-in-training error

Nicky Henderson receives £2,500 fine for horses-in-training error

Nicky Henderson receives £2,500 fine for horses-in-training error

Nicky Henderson has been fined £2,500 for failing to keep his horses-in-training register updated. The discovery was made by the BHA after routine testing last October.

Henderson continues to be one of the trainers at the forefront of the sport. He enjoyed another set of successes at the Cheltenham Festival in 2026, landing the opening Supreme Novices’ Hurdle with old Park Star.

However, the Seven Barrows handler has landed himself in hot water. He and his team failed to keep the register of their horses-in-training up to date, as discovered by the BHA. When officials visited to test 28 horses at Henderson’s yard, six were no longer in his care.

Henderson was interviews in December about the mix-up, suggesting there had been a clerical error. That mistake had allowed three horses who had been rehomed without the BHA having updated information.

Among the horses to have appeared as “still in training” with Henderson was Queen’s Cave. However, the mare had not been in training since May 2022. Issuing Authority, Quick Draw, Meadowsuite, She Can Do It and an unnamed filly were the other five horses picked for testing who were not found to be present.

Retirement of horses leading factor in absence of information

All six of the aforementioned horses are no longer in training as racehorses. It is this factor which Henderson believes led to their whereabouts going unknown, at least in terms of their sporting continuation.

A panorama documentary released in 2021 outlined why an updated register is so important. Vyta Du Roc, a horse formerly trained by Henderson, was shown in the documentary to be walking into an abattoir. The shocking scenes were widely criticised although Seven Barrows were acquitted from any knowledge of Vyta Du Roc’s sad fate.

The BHA has since rigidly updated its traceability measures, hence the seriousness of Henderson’s fine. However, they and their judicial panel believe this will now prove a one-off.

The panel’s summary concluded, as reported by the Racing Post: “Mr Henderson’s position is that the error arose because the horses had retired from racing and had left his yard on their retirement from the sport, and prior to pursuing second careers unconnected with horseracing. 

“Mr Henderson believes that the error in not providing notification that the horses had left his care came about, in part at least, as a consequence of those horses having retired from racing and no longer being connected to or with the sport.”